|
Power
on tap:
Cars that run on water?
It's not as daft as it sounds, discovers
David Adam
Publication
Date:30-July-2006
10:00 AM US Eastern Timezone
Source: New Scientist
Forget cars fuelled
by alcohol and vegetable oil. Before long, you might be able
to run your car with nothing more than water in its fuel
tank. It would be the ultimate zero-emissions vehicle. While
water, plain old H2O, is not at first sight an obvious power
source, it has a key virtue: it is an abundant source of
hydrogen, the element widely touted as the green fuel of the
future. If that hydrogen could be liberated on demand, it
would overcome many of the obstacles that till now have
prevented the dream of a hydrogen-powered car becoming
reality.
Tareq Abu-Hamed,
now at the University of Minnesota, and colleagues at the
Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, have
devised a scheme that gets round these problems. By reacting
water with the element boron, their system produces hydrogen
that can be burnt in an internal combustion engine or fed to
a fuel cell to generate electricity. "The aim is to
produce the hydrogen on-board at a rate
matching the demand of the car engine," says Abu-Hamed.
"We want to use the boron to save transporting and
storing the hydrogen." The only by-product is boron
oxide, which can be removed from the car, turned back into
boron, and used again. What's more, Abu-Hamed envisages
doing this in a solar-powered plant that is completely
emission-free.
Simple chemistry.
The team calculates
that a car would have to carry just 18 kilograms of boron
and 45 litres of water to produce 5 kilograms of hydrogen,
which has the same energy content as a 40-litre tank of
conventional fuel. An Israeli company has begun designing a
prototype engine that works in the same way, and the
Japanese company Samsung has built a prototype scooter based
on a similar idea.
The
hydrogen-on-demand approach is based on some simple
high-school chemistry. Elements like sodium and potassium
are well known for their violent reactions with water,
tearing hydrogen from its stable union with oxygen. Boron
does the same, but at a more manageable pace. It requires no
special containment, and atom for atom it's a light
material. When all the boron is used up, the boron oxide
that remains can be reprocessed and recycled.
Abu-Hamed and his
team are not the first to
investigate hydrogen-on-demand vehicles.
The car giant DaimlerChrysler built a concept vehicle called
Natrium (after the Latin word for sodium, from which the
element's Na symbol is drawn), which used slightly more
sophisticated chemistry to generate its hydrogen. Instead of
pure water as the source of the gas, it used a solution of
the hydrogen-heavy compound sodium borohydride.
When passed over a precious-metal catalyst
such as ruthenium, the compound reacts with water to
liberate hydrogen that can be fed to a fuel cell. It was
enough to give the Natrium a top speed of 130 kilometres per
hour and a respectable range of 500 kilometres, but
DaimlerChrysler axed the project in 2003 because of
difficulties in providing the necessary infrastructure to
support the car in an efficient, environmentally friendly
way.
Engineuity, an
Israeli start-up company run by Amnon Yogev, a former
Weizmann Institute scientist, is working on a similar
strategy, but using the reaction between aluminium wire and
water to generate hydrogen. In Engineuity's design, the tip
of the metal wire is ignited and dipped into water to begin
splitting the water molecules. The liberated hydrogen is
piped into the engine alongside the resulting steam, where
it is mixed with air and burnt. Engineuity is looking for
investors to pay for a prototype, and claims it will be able
to commercialise its idea "in a few years' time".
The US company
PowerBall Technologies envisages a hydrogen-on-demand engine
containing plasticballs filled with sodium hydride powder
that are split to dump the contents into water, where it
reacts to produce hydrogen.
Abu-Hamed says the
generation of hydrogen for his team's engine would be
regulated by controlling the flow of water into a series of
tanks containing powdered boron. To kick-start the reaction,
the water has to be supplied as vapour heated to several
hundred degrees, so the car will still require some start-up
power, possibly from a battery. Once the engine is running,
the heat generated by the highly exothermic oxidation
reaction between boron and water could be used to warm the
incoming water, Abu-Hamed says. Alternatively, small amounts
of hydrogen could be diverted from the engine and stored for
use as the start-up fuel. Water produced when the hydrogen
is burnt in an internal combustion engine or reacted in a
fuel cell could be captured and cycled back to the vehicle's
tank, making the whole on-board system truly zero-emission.
Hydrogen-on-demand,
whether from water or another source, could address two of
the big problems still holding back the wider use of
hydrogen as a vehicle fuel: how to store the flammable gas,
and how to transport it safely.
Today's hydrogen-fuelled cars rely on stocks of gas produced
in centralised plants and distributed via refuelling
stations in either liquefied or compressed form. Neither is
ideal. The liquefaction process eats up to 40 per cent of
the energy content of the stored hydrogen, while the energy
density of the gas, even when compressed, is so low it is
hard to see how it can ever be used to fuel a normal car.
Hydrogen-on-demand
would not only remove the need for costly hydrogen pipelines
and distribution infrastructure, it would also make hydrogen
vehicles safer. "The theoretical advantage of on-board
generation is that you don't have to muck about with
hydrogen storage," says Mike Millikin, who monitors
developments in alternative fuels for the Green
Car Congress website. A car that doesn't need to carry tanks
of flammable, volatile liquid or compressed gas would be
much less vulnerable in an accident. "It also
potentially offsets the requirements for building up a
massive hydrogen production and distribution
infrastructure," Millikin says.
There is a
potentially polluting step that has to be tackled.
"You'll need an infrastructure to produce and
distribute whatever the key elements of the generation
system might be," Millikin warns. While Abu-Hamed's
scheme still requires a distribution network and
reprocessing plant, he has devised an ingenious plan that
will allow the spent boron oxide to be converted back to
metallic boron in a pollution-free process that uses only
solar energy . Heating the oxide with magnesium powder
recovers the boron, leaving magnesium oxide as a by-product.
The magnesium oxide can then be recycled by first reacting
it with chlorine gas to produce magnesium chloride, from
which the magnesium metal and chlorine can then be recovered
by electrolysis.
Solar source
The energy to drive these processes would ultimately come
from the sun. The team calculates that a system of mirrors
could concentrate enough sunlight to produce electricity
from solar cells with an efficiency of 35 per cent. Overall,
they say, their system could convert solar energy into work
by the car's engine with an efficiency of 11 per cent,
similar to today's petrol engines.
Experts are
sceptical that we'll be seeing cars running on water any
time soon. "It's not the kind of thing you're going to
see appearing in a car in five or even ten years'
time," says Jim Skea, research director at the UK
Energy Research Centre in London. For example,
DaimlerChrysler is now focusing its efforts on cars running
on compressed hydrogen because filling stations that supply
it already exist in some places.
Proponents of cars
that run on water are banking that long term the idea will
win out. Engineuity's Yogev claims the running costs will be
comparable to those of today's petrol engines and expects to
have a prototype built within three years.
My other car runs
on water? Don't bet against it.
David Adam is
environment correspondent for The Guardian newspaper in
London
|